Home - el Khazen Family Prince of Maronites : Lebanese Families Keserwan Lebanon

Analyzing Israel's Intelligence Lapse

Details

In the early days of October, Israel was caught off guard by an unexpected Hamas attack. Despite Israel's highly regarded intelligence agencies and advanced surveillance systems, Hamas was able to circumvent these defenses using modest methods. The failure to anticipate and swiftly respond to the attack has raised numerous questions regarding the efficacy of Israel's intelligence and its political implications. The attack unearthed several operational and logistical shortcomings within Israeli military and intelligence structures. Contributing factors may have included a lack of readiness due to internal political unrest and the draining of skilled personnel from elite intelligence units to the private sector. The situation underscored the potential dangers of underestimating adversaries and over-relying on technological surveillance.

Hamas's tactical surprise revealed an innovative approach, utilizing simple but effective methods to overwhelm Israel's security infrastructure around Gaza. They exploited Israel's focus on other regions and its presumptions about Hamas's intentions. The attack not only unveiled Hamas's improved operational capabilities but also highlighted the significance of operational security to prevent intelligence leaks. The aftermath of this intelligence failure could prompt a reevaluation within Israel's political and military landscapes. Public opinion within Israel appears to be highly critical of the leadership's handling of the situation, and there may be calls for significant overhauls in the intelligence and security sectors. This episode has also potentially set the stage for shifting dynamics in the larger region.

Google Bard AI Stumbles over Israel-Palestine Queries

Details

In a recent development, Google's conversational AI chatbot, Bard, has come under scrutiny for its handling of queries related to the Israel-Palestine conflict. Since its launch in March 2023, Bard has faced several challenges including negative reviews and a glitch that displayed shared conversations in Google Search results. The latest controversy surrounds Bard's refusal to respond to any questions concerning Israel and Palestine, especially regarding the October 7 Hamas terror attacks and Israel's retaliatory actions. Even general questions unrelated to the crisis, like geographical inquiries, are met with silence from the chatbot.

This peculiar behavior was highlighted by Peli Greitzer, a PhD mathematical literary theorist, who shared his findings on platform X. The avoidance strategy employed by Bard starkly contrasts with OpenAI's ChatGPT's approach, which offers varied responses when asked about justice for Israelis and Palestinians. The disparity in responses from ChatGPT, favoring a straightforward acknowledgment of justice for Israelis while presenting a nuanced stance for Palestinians, has sparked criticisms, notably from British-Iraqi journalist Mona Chalabi on social media.

The cautious approach by Google, seemingly to avoid potential backlash, reflects a broader challenge faced by AI developers striving to balance informative responses with sensitive global issues. While Bard is capable of providing extensive summaries on other global conflicts like the Ukraine-Russia war, its deliberate avoidance of Israel-Palestine topics raises questions about the neutrality and the ethical framework guiding AI responses. This scenario underscores the intricate dilemma companies encounter when programming AI to navigate politically charged topics, thereby spotlighting the necessity for a robust ethical framework in AI development and deployment. VentureBeat has reached out to Google for comments on Bard's behavior, anticipating further insights into the workings and guiding principles of conversational AI platforms.

The McDonald’s Global Empire Is Tearing Itself Apart Over Israel-Palestine

Details

In the aftermath of the recent conflict between Israel and Hamas, McDonald's franchises in Israel and across the Middle East have been propelled into the political spotlight. A McDonald's franchise in Israel showcased its support for the Israel Defense Forces, offering meals to those involved in state defense. This gesture was met with a swift response from McDonald's outlets in the Middle East, underlining the geopolitical sensitivities within the region.

McDonald's branches in the Middle East hurriedly distanced themselves from the actions of the Israeli franchise, emphasizing their independence and differing political stances. Many branches expressed their support for Palestinian causes, showcasing a divergent political alignment within the McDonald's global brand. This incident has unveiled the challenges global brands face when navigating political landscapes, especially in regions with ongoing geopolitical tensions.

The varying reactions among the McDonald's franchises reflect a larger issue faced by global brands, who struggle to maintain a consistent brand message amidst diverse political views from their customer base. As geopolitical tensions continue to rise, multinational corporations find themselves at a crossroads, striving to balance between catering to local political sensitivities and maintaining a unified brand image. The unfolding events hint at a complex future awaiting global corporations as they navigate through the intricate web of geopolitics in different markets.

As criticisms mounts, CNN denies accusations of bias in Gaza coverage

Details

A video went viral showing Egyptian protester Rahma Zein confronting CNN's Clarissa Ward at the Israel-Gaza border.

Zein accused Ward and Western media of biased, dehumanizing coverage favoring Israel over Palestinians.

Zein criticized Ward for not properly covering Palestinian deaths and the humanitarian crisis.

Many on social media supported Zein's critique of bias in CNN and Western outlets.

Ward and CNN defended their reporting, saying they are determined to present all sides and have extensively covered Palestinian voices.

A CNN spokesperson reiterated they are interviewing many perspectives, including dozens of Palestinians, to give audiences a full understanding.

Some scientists seriously believe we could live forever by the 2030s. Here's what you need to know about the 'longevity escape velocity' theory.

Details

by This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. - (Hilary Brueck) Eternal youth-seekers and investors alike are getting increasingly excited about a concept called "Longevity Escape Velocity." This hypothetical idea borrows its name from "escape velocity," the basic physics principle which states that objects can, at a certain speed, defy gravity's pull. Longevity escape velocity suggests, similarly, that at some point in the not-too-distant future people will be able to escape the debilitating pull of death — and live indefinitely. Longevity escape velocity is our ticket to immortality. If only science could figure out how to cash it in. While LEV is only a theory for now, its backers contend that it could be a reality in not too many decades, given the rapid advances in aging science. As we get better at rejuvenating our cells, we will be able to improve the quality of our lives so exponentially that people will be increasing their life expectancy faster than they're living, thus approaching a near-immortal state, or so the theory goes. There are several science-backed reasons why some people live longer, healthier lives than others. There are also a lot of scams out there claiming that they promote "antiaging" when they don't.

Here's what's really proven to increase your lifespan, and what's not. Harvard geneticist George Church has entertained the idea that maybe, just maybe, we'll reach this state within your lifetime, reader. Sourav Sinha, head of strategy at the Longevity Vision Fund, said much the same during a recent panel discussion about stopping age-related diseases in New York, suggesting LEV could be possible within a couple of decades, with the right kinds of investments. Longevity researcher Aubrey de Grey, one of the originators of the term, and perhaps its fiercest proponent, has put a very rosy, best-case scenario for LEV impossibly close — somewhere in the 2030s. Futurist Ray Kurtzweil has suggested an even earlier debut for LEV, perhaps by 2028 or 2029, which would not be enough time for authorities to approve any anti-aging drugs or treatments (we have none so far.)

And now, a growing number of leading pioneers in anti-aging research are signing on to a new "Dublin Longevity Declaration," which calls on their entire field of science to focus on reversing biological aging processes at the cellular level. Trying to improve aging the old-school way, by going after one disease at a time, is "overly pragmatic" and taking too long, the declaration says. "Everyone knows aging is bad, everyone says it's bad, but nobody does anything about it," de Grey said in a release when his new declaration was announced in early October. "Like bad weather – people are stuck in the assumption that nothing can be done, even if we try. We wanted to put that assumption to rest."

Meta has a moderation bias problem, not just a ‘bug,’ that’s suppressing Palestinian voices Instagram users suspect Meta of shadowbanning content about Palestine. The platform has a history of inherent bias.

Details

by Morgan Sung@morgan_sung -- techcrunch -- Earlier this year, Palestinian-American filmmaker Khitam Jabr posted a handful of Reels about her family’s trip to the West Bank. In the short travel vlogs, Jabr shared snippets of Palestinian culture, from eating decadent meals to dancing at her niece’s wedding. “I hadn’t been in a decade, so it’s just like, life abroad,” Jabr told TechCrunch. But then, she noticed something odd happening with her account. “I would get [anti-Palestine] comments,” she recalled. “And I couldn’t respond [to them] or use my account for 24 hours. I wasn’t even posting anything about the occupation. But fast forward to now and the same shit’s happening.” In the aftermath of Hamas’ attack on Israelis, Israel’s retaliatory airstrikes and total blockade — cutting access to electricity, water and vital supplies — have devastated Gaza. In response to the escalating violence, Meta said that it is closely monitoring its platforms for violations and may inadvertently flag certain content, but it never intends to “suppress a particular community or point of view.” Content praising or supporting Hamas, which governs Gaza and is designated as a terrorist organization by the United States and the European Union, is expressly forbidden on Meta’s platforms.

As the humanitarian crisis in Gaza grows more dire, many social media users suspect Instagram of censoring content about the besieged Palestinian territory, even if that content doesn’t support Hamas. Users have also complained that they’ve been harassed and reported for posting content about Palestine, regardless of whether or not it violates Meta’s policies. Jabr, for example, suspects that Instagram restricted her for 24 hours because other users reported her Palestine travel videos. Most recently, Instagram users accused Meta of “shadowbanning” their Stories about Palestine. It’s the latest in a lengthy history of incidents on Meta platforms that reflect an inherent bias against Palestinian users in its processes, as documented by years of complaints from both inside and outside the company. The company may not intentionally suppress specific communities, but its moderation practices often disproportionately affect Palestinian users.

Gartner: Generative AI will be everywhere, so strategize now

Details

By Taryn Plumb - venturebeat -- The human-machine relationship is dynamic and evolving. Generative AI, in particular, is set to completely transform enterprise processes, decision-making, strategy and other elements that have yet to be considered. For this reason, AI adoption should no longer be considered an IT initiative, but an enterprise initiative. Furthermore, to keep pace and take full advantage, executives must prioritize their AI ambitions and AI-ready scenarios for the next 12 to 24 months. How human-centered design drives data-driven experiences In today’s competitive market Gartner analysts offered this guidance — as well as a slew of other stats and predictions, most involving generative AI — at this week’s IT Symposium/Xpo in which wraps tomorrow. “Generative AI is not just a technology or business trend — it is a profound shift in how humans and machines interact,” Gartner distinguished VP analyst Mary Mesaglio said in an opening keynote. “We are moving from what machines can do for us to what machines can be for us.”

The year generative AI becomes democratized

Nearly three-quarters (73%) of CIOs polled by Gartner said their enterprise will increase funding for AI/ML in 2024. Similarly, 80% said their organizations are planning on full gen AI adoption within the next three years. This strategizing, along with the confluence of massively pretrained models, cloud computing and open source, will make 2024 the year that gen AI becomes democratized. Boldly, Gartner predicts that by 2025, the technology will be a workforce partner for 90% of organizations globally. In turn, this will lead to the need for AI Trust, Risk and Security Management (TRiSM), which will provide tooling for ModelOps, proactive data protection, AI-specific security, monitoring for data and model drift and risk controls for both inputs and outputs, according to Gartner.